<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Wireless LAN Professionals - Latest Comments</title><link>http://wirelesslanprofessionals.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://wirelesslanprofessionals.disqus.com/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Feb 2014 17:15:07 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: WLW052 &amp;#8211; 7 Rules for Accurate Site Surveys</title><link>http://www.wlanpros.com/wlw052-7-rules-accurate-site-surveys/#comment-1250524439</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Passive survey is about coverage quality. Coverage is (or is not) there regardless of the device type.&lt;br&gt;Of course, performance of devices differs, but that matters when doing Active surveys. Thankfully, iPerf was ported onto almost every platform that exists. Some vendors, like Auba, even include it as part of their on-device tools.&lt;br&gt;Not an ideal solution, but can augment Active survey data done with professional software. Typically involves running a cart with one laptop runnings something serious and a bunch of other client devices recording data along the same path.&lt;br&gt;Keith, what's your take - is it one of the 'poor active survey - better not do it at all' scenarios? It's better than nothing.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Arsen Bandurian</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Feb 2014 17:15:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: WLW052 &amp;#8211; 7 Rules for Accurate Site Surveys</title><link>http://www.wlanpros.com/wlw052-7-rules-accurate-site-surveys/#comment-1250515314</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Great stuff! Highly useful and enjoyable.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;One thing that wasn't mentioned, though, is survey software that actually DOES take walls/etc into account when doing extrapolation.&lt;br&gt;Motorola's LAN Planner is the one.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Arsen Bandurian</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Feb 2014 17:10:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: WLW 009 &amp;#8211; CCIE Wireless Lab Prep / Professional Reputation</title><link>http://wlanpros2.project.ihelphosting.com/wlw-009-ccie-wireless-lab-professional-reputation/#comment-1231624925</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Currently I have finished Fast Lane CCIE Wireless workbook.&lt;br&gt;It is a good guide for understanding technology. Now I am going to study directly&lt;br&gt;for the passing lab exam. If someone need more insight contact me at dzolotorev@yahoo.com&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dmitriy</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 05 Feb 2014 04:30:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: WiFi Scanners for Mac OS X</title><link>http://www.wlanpros.com/wifi-scanners-for-mac-os-x/#comment-1230416741</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You forgot NetSpot :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">debbiedowner3</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 04 Feb 2014 09:36:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 802.11ac Packet-Analysis Finally Arrives</title><link>http://www.wlanpros.com/802-11ac-packet-analysis-finally-arrives/#comment-1209970049</link><description>&lt;p&gt;hi Keith,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Very nice article indeed.  I am trying to setup the AE6000 with Omnipeek and downloaded the Ralink v3.2.4.5 drivers from the mypeek portal however the install hangs in device manager unless I unplug and replug back in the USB adapter.  When that's all done the adapter installs and is constantly disabled.  Do you have a copy of the drivers you used during the session?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Edit: Please ignore.  It is the Beta Ralink Driver – Version 5.0.7.7 as posted by Todd.  &lt;a href="https://mypeek.wildpackets.com/products/extras.php?wp_sku=ope" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="https://mypeek.wildpackets.com/products/extras.php?wp_sku=ope"&gt;https://mypeek.wildpackets....&lt;/a&gt;  Hope this helps someone else who runs into this problem&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Pete&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">PeteGGG</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Jan 2014 21:54:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: WLW052 &amp;#8211; 7 Rules for Accurate Site Surveys</title><link>http://www.wlanpros.com/wlw052-7-rules-accurate-site-surveys/#comment-1196348534</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You are correct - it is difficult to get 100% accuracy when the client devices are all over the map. But... an accurate survey can be internally consistent. It can be consistent between sites. It can be a tool to confirm and validate your WLAN meets certains specifications.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">KeithRParsons</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 11 Jan 2014 11:12:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: WLW052 &amp;#8211; 7 Rules for Accurate Site Surveys</title><link>http://www.wlanpros.com/wlw052-7-rules-accurate-site-surveys/#comment-1196320136</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for your time Keith, the podcast was great!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;However, site surveys can't be accurate and it will never be. When you do pre-deployment survey you are using some kind of USB device, yes? You collect the data, do all the analysis, prepare the report... But in real world, users will use various type of devices, with various WLAN cards/drivers/antennas... And sometimes, you can't know it! What is your advice?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Johnny</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 11 Jan 2014 10:40:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: WLW049 &amp;#8211; Hotspot 2.0</title><link>http://www.wlanpros.com/wlw049-hotspot-2-0/#comment-1183131862</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Keith, great info on the topic of Hotspot 2.0, also well explained process of AP installation, would help a lot with troubleshooting process.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Regards&lt;br&gt;Radek&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Radek</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 01 Jan 2014 07:44:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: WLW051 &amp;#8211; It&amp;#8217;s All About the People</title><link>http://www.wlanpros.com/wlw051-people/#comment-1178863126</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Great overview of the tap, Keith. Thanks for providing this valuable info to the community. Good to hear from Devin too!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tom Carpenter</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Dec 2013 20:25:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: WLW050 &amp;#8211; Preparing for CCIE-W</title><link>http://www.wlanpros.com/wlw050-preparing-ccie-w/#comment-1164435356</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Keith, please do video podcasts ;) it should be easy!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">guest</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 15 Dec 2013 05:23:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tools to Learn Spectrum Analysis Signatures</title><link>http://www.wlanpros.com/tools-learn-spectrum-analysis-signatures/#comment-1154134620</link><description>&lt;p&gt;He's using an older version of Chanalyzer that included 3D view - either Chanalyzer Lite&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You can get it here:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.metageek.net/support/metageek-software-archives/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.metageek.net/support/metageek-software-archives/"&gt;http://www.metageek.net/sup...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Fernand Jonker</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 07 Dec 2013 12:01:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter for the Wireless LAN Professional</title><link>http://www.wlanpros.com/twitter-for-the-wireless-lan-professional/#comment-1129984722</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Keith,&lt;br&gt;I hate to contact you this way, but the email I have for you (mail@wlanpros.com) isn't working. Can you email me at hobart@vocalizepr.com?&lt;br&gt;Hobie&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Hobart Swan</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 19 Nov 2013 14:26:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 802.11ac Packet-Analysis Finally Arrives</title><link>http://www.wlanpros.com/802-11ac-packet-analysis-finally-arrives/#comment-1111334856</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The driver is at the following link when logged&lt;br&gt;into the MyPeek portal &lt;a href="https://mypeek.wildpackets.com/products/extras.php?wp_sku=ope" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="https://mypeek.wildpackets.com/products/extras.php?wp_sku=ope"&gt;https://mypeek.wildpackets....&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Todd</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2013 12:40:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tools to Learn Spectrum Analysis Signatures</title><link>http://www.wlanpros.com/tools-learn-spectrum-analysis-signatures/#comment-1109655053</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Keith,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;How you got that 3d-view on chanalyzer? I have chanalyzer pro on windows (the newest version) but there is nothing similar.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Johnny</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 Nov 2013 09:41:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Explaining Wi-Fi to a Non-Techie Audience</title><link>http://www.wlanpros.com/explaining-wi-fi-non-techie-audience/#comment-1087376917</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Beautifully done!  I'll be passing this around my Helpdesk front line staff at their next training session =)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Frank</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Oct 2013 14:05:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 802.11ac Packet-Analysis Finally Arrives</title><link>http://www.wlanpros.com/802-11ac-packet-analysis-finally-arrives/#comment-1074607052</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Nice article. I have a question. Where did you obtained driver for AE6000? I was looking for driver on Wildpackets site but with no success. Can you upload it somewhere, or send it to me by e-mail, please?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Guest</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 Oct 2013 02:54:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 802.11ac Packet-Analysis Finally Arrives</title><link>http://www.wlanpros.com/802-11ac-packet-analysis-finally-arrives/#comment-1023805691</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I love how Linksys's marketing pictures show the card in a MBP, but it only supports Windows ;-)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Henry Stukenborg</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2013 17:48:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: All About Wireless LAN 102: The Answers to Your Questions</title><link>http://www.wlanpros.com/all-about-wireless-lan-102-the-answers-to-your-questions/#comment-1021283746</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Pros, I am busy with some studies and would like your opinion on this question. The question is as follows....&lt;br&gt;802.11a supports different modulation techniques,each allowing for different data rates.This adds complexity and cost to the radio. The Manager suggests 802,11zzz should only support one modulation technique, namely the maximum data rate possible. Do you support this idea? Why or why not?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Errol Abrahams</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2013 19:23:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter for the Wireless LAN Professional</title><link>http://www.wlanpros.com/twitter-for-the-wireless-lan-professional/#comment-1021261022</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi I'm George and has just joined this great group of Pro's on this website. I do like what I have read because there is so much to learn. I will keep on reading this great reading material.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Errol Abrahams</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2013 19:07:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Access Point Installer Checklist</title><link>http://www.wlanpros.com/access-point-installer-checklist/#comment-1002306282</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the comments. It's far better to find out these issues *before* the AP is broadcasting in the air. After the AP is on, everyone will try to troubleshoot it as a "Wireless Problem".&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">KeithRParsons</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Aug 2013 10:26:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Access Point Installer Checklist</title><link>http://www.wlanpros.com/access-point-installer-checklist/#comment-1002298674</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thank you for sharing this. It definitely helps. Only recently I discovered how useful it is to have a checklist for AP installation (to prevent wire-side issues, such as an AP negotiating 100M uplink instead of 1G).&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alex</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Aug 2013 10:20:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Fast, Free &amp;#038; Easy Public Wi-Fi – A Cost of Doing Business</title><link>http://www.wlanpros.com/fast-free-easy-public-wi-fi-a-cost-of-doing-business/#comment-997479539</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You could ad, Wifi in hôtel is the busiest place. No other "place" where there is so much customers. so of course it is a priority.&lt;br&gt;Not agree when u say, it is a cost pb, on Internet access. It is almost a technical pb, a BYOD paradigm. No control, on what they do, what they bring, how configured they are, it is total surprise.&lt;br&gt;And very often, 9/10, when customers, say "wifi sucks", you look at the machine, and, u see no firewall ("what's that?"), sharing activate by one or other way, VNC, DropBox, files, iTunes Lib and so on... totally forgot, they are on a big public LAN! with unknown machines doing unknown things.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bob</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Aug 2013 10:08:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;#8220;How To Guide&amp;#8221; for IPerf &amp;#038; JPerf</title><link>http://wlanpros2.project.ihelphosting.com/how-to-guide-for-iperf-jperf/#comment-995504812</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks a lot for the Guide.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rakesh Mukundan</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 10 Aug 2013 09:31:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: It&amp;#8217;s all about the people</title><link>http://www.wlanpros.com/its-all-about-the-people/#comment-995296767</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yessiree. It rings true brother.  It's all about the people.  Thanks for the great blog Keith!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Devin Akin</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 10 Aug 2013 00:41:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 802.11ac Packet-Analysis Finally Arrives</title><link>http://www.wlanpros.com/802-11ac-packet-analysis-finally-arrives/#comment-993124692</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Good write up, Keith.  Just ordered that device and was a bit concerned after some of the tweets from WFD about installation!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rocky Gregory</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Aug 2013 10:47:53 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>